![]() ![]() 1970 for the Soviets,and so on.) Aye, all valid points. 1970 for the Soviets,and so on.)Īlthough I actually kind of wish to see some sort of Modern Tanks,I think it's better if they limited it to the highest being an M06A1 RISE.(T-62 obr. The Chally 2 as far as I know has not met any type of actual Modern armanent used by Conventional armies and not Terrorist-grade(read:Cheap) weapons.We haven't seen the Chally 2 go up against a 125mm,an Modern Russian ATGM(Metis-M) or suffered bombings against it in intensity akin to the Coalition bombing in Iraq now,have we?Īlthough I actually kind of wish to see some sort of Modern Tanks,I think it's better if they limited it to the highest being an M06A1 RISE.(T-62 obr. I'd more prefer continuing the lines we have now up to 1970, as those would be easier to balance and probably more fun to play. I still think it would be interesting, no doubt about that, but to keep the balance it would be quite difficult. Armament is pretty similar, so no real advantage there. It's a little slower than the Abrams and the Leopard, but makes up for it with Chobham II armour (or also known as Dorchester). ![]() Not one tank has ever been lost in combat, and there are numerous accounts of it taking brutal amounts of damage, one even taking 70 direct RPG hits and the worst damage done was to it's optics. Originally posted by MoonPrune:Thing is that once you start bringing stuff like Abrams in you also have to bring it's competitors, the T90, the Armata, Leopard 2, Challenger 2, and a couple others.Īnd let me put this bluntly, I don't know much about the others but I do know that the Challenger 2 would be the new T-10M of War Thunder. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |